"Put that on your perv tape."

"Put that on your perv tape."

Feb 13

If someone hasn’t sent this to Sarah by now, they probably should have. I’ll do it! In fact, if you haven’t seen it yet, watch soon, as I wonder how long it will take before it’s yanked prior to the season 3 DVD release. On the other hand, it’s so full of odds and ends that would normally require various permissions outside of a wrap party, that it may never make it to DVD. Which means all the more reason to watch it now.

Besides the excellent use of old footage of the vetran cast (watch for Colonol Tigh in 1978’s High Ballin’ – hoooly shit) there’s an insane amount of editting love put into this blooper reel. Like, heads and shoulders more than you usually find. Blooper footage and final takes are editted together to even greater effect. There are a handful of musical montages. And what I thought was going to be the BSG equivalent of The Farting Preacher turns into film evidence that the cast, particularly Edward James Olmos, have occasionally played havok with the air quality on a closed set. If you know what I mean.

Go. Watch. Now.

3 comments

  1. Awesome! Three *is* the magic number.

  2. By the way, do you think Katee is joking during the “spoilers” section? It seemed pretty tongue-in-cheek to me, but all the internet jabberin’ has me worried.

  3. Internet Jabber is just Internet Jabber. From a writing standpoint, they kind of blew their wad with that trick already. I took it as tongue in cheek too. And I’m going to leave it at that, because then that way, no matter what happens, it’s a surprise.

    Remember the internet, being a finite amount of monkeys, will never get you Shakespeare, but you will get every possible permutation of every possible lame plot twist applied to every possible genre show, real and imagined. Which is often more fun than Shakespeare.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. alert nerd. - [...] Anyway. Another thing that gives me hope: remember that wrap party reel Chris posted? Three/Lucy Lawless gets a whole…

Leave a Reply to Chris